Dr. Anthony Fauci, the head of NIH, proudly announced that a trial had been going on for “two years” had “clearly shown” that early intervention will keep AIDS at bay. But he was not telling the truth, and soon people would die from AZT by the tens of thousands.
Back in the 1980's, Anthony Fauci was an up-and-coming star at the National Institutes of Health, and he stepped into the battlefield of HIV-AIDS to see what he could do. By the time he was done "fixing things", tens of thousands of HIV-positive patients would be dead, and their cause of death would be the drug he pushed doctors to prescribe for their treatment, AZT. It was during this time period that people who come to no longer trust government health agencies like the CDC, the FDA and the NIH. Anthony Fauci was the star villain in the AIDS crisis, and he is repeating that same behavior right now in 2021 with the COVID-19 vaccine boondoggle.
"So they poured out for the men to eat. And it came to pass, as they were eating of the pottage, that they cried out, and said, O thou man of God, there is death in the pot. And they could not eat thereof." 2 Kings 4:40 (KJB)
My brother Bob was one of the thousands of HIV-AIDS patients who died at the hands of Anthony Fauci's recommendations, dying from liver failure and heart attack from AZT toxicity. In our day, the same Anthony Fauci is still dispensing the same terrible medical advice, and you may listen to him at your own peril. The company that made AZT, Burroughs-Wellcome, sold the drug at $8,000.00 per year, and they became insanely wealthy from it. Anthony Fauci became a star in the medical field, and the dead bodies stacked up as far as the eye could see.
DOCTOR DOOM: ANTHONY FAUCI’S PUSH FOR AZT TO TREAT HIV AIDS KILLED MY BROTHER IN 1988, AND HERE IN 2021 HIS MISERABLE ADVICE IS STILL JUST AS DEADLY
The 1989 AIDS and the AZT Scandal: ‘Sins of Omission’
Celia Farber was the editor and unearthed hard evidence of the cold-bloodedness of the AIDS establishment pushing a drug that was worse than the disease, and killed faster than the natural progression of AIDS left untreated. You can read her entire article here.
August 17, 1989: The government announced that 1.4 million healthy, HIV antibody-positive Americans could “benefit” from taking AZT, even though they show no symptoms of disease. New studies have “proven” that AZT is effective in stopping the progression of AIDS in asymptomatic and early ARC cases. Dr. Fauci, the head of NIH, proudly announced that a trial has been going on for “two years” had “clearly shown” that early intervention will keep AIDS at bay. Anyone who has antibodies to HIV and less than 500 T-4 cells should start taking AZT at once, he said. That is approximately 650,000 people. 1.4 million Americans are assumed HIV antibody-positive, and eventually all of them may need to take AZT so they don’t get sick, Fauci contended.
In December 1988, the Lancet published a study that Burroughs Wellcome and the NIH do not include in their press kits. It was more expansive than the original AZT study and followed patients longer. It was not conducted in the United States, but in France, at the Claude Bernard Hospital in Paris, and concluded the same things about AZT that Burroughs Wellcome’s study did, except Burroughs Wellcome called their results “overwhelmingly positive,” and the French doctors called theirs “disappointing.” The French study found, once again, that AZT was too toxic for most to tolerate, had no lasting effect on HIV blood levels, and left the patients with fewer T-4 cells than they started with. Although they noticed a clinical improvement at first, they concluded that “by six months, these values had returned to their pretreatment levels, and several opportunistic infections, malignancies, and deaths occurred.”
The news that AZT would soon be prescribed to asymptomatic people left many leading AIDS doctors dumbfounded and furious. Every doctor and scientist I asked felt that it was highly unprofessional and reckless to announce a study with no data to look at, making recommendations with such drastic public health implications. “This simply does not happen,” says Bialy. “The government is reporting scientific facts before they’ve been reviewed? It’s unheard of.”
“It’s beyond belief,” says Dr. Sonnabend in a voice tinged with desperation. “I don’t know what to do. I have to go in and face an office full of people asking for AZT. I’m terrified. I don’t know what to do as a responsible physician. The first study was ridiculous. Margaret Fischl, who has done both of these studies, obviously doesn’t know the first thing about clinical trials. I don’t trust her. Or the others. They’re simply not good enough. We’re being held hostage by second-rate scientists. We let them get away with the first disaster; now they’re doing it again.”
“It’s a momentous decision to say to people, ‘If you’re HIV-positive and your T-4 cells are below 500, start taking AZT,'” says the AIDS doctor who wished to remain anonymous. “I know dozens of people that I’ve seen personally every few months for several years now who have been in that state for more than five years, and have not progressed to any disease.”
“I’m ashamed of my colleagues,” Sonnabend laments. “I’m embarrassed. This is such shoddy science it’s hard to believe nobody is protesting. Damned cowards. The name of the game is to protect your grant, don’t open your mouth. It’s all about money… it’s grounds for just following the party line and not being critical, when there are obviously financial and political forces driving this.” READ THE FULL ARTICLE
No comments:
Post a Comment