by Judith Bergman • February 22, 2018 at
5:00 am
§ One of the most troubling aspects of this rapidly
spreading dhimmitude, is the de-facto enforcement of Islamic blasphemy laws.
Local European authorities have been utilizing "hate speech" laws to
prohibit criticism of Islam, even though Islam represents an idea, not a
nationality or an ethnicity. The conventional purpose of most hate-speech laws
is to protect people from hatred, not ideas.
§ The British Foreign Office, which has ignored
Iranian women's desperate fight for freedom and stayed shamefully silent during
the Iranian people's recent protests against Iran's regime, unbelievably handed
out free headscarves to its staff. Meanwhile, at least 29 Iranian women were
arrested for shedding the hijab, and were likely subjected to rape and other
torture, as is common in Iranian prisons. Yet British MPs and Foreign Office
employees were perversely celebrating the hijab as some sort of twisted tool of
"female empowerment".
§ Counter-jihad measures have been obstructed by
Western leaders everywhere since immediately after 9/11. President George W.
Bush declared that "Islam is peace". President Obama removed all
references to Islam in FBI terror training manuals that Muslims deemed
offensive. New York City's current leadership threatened New Yorkers,
immediately after the October terror attack in Manhattan, not to link the
terror attack to Islam. UK Prime Minister Theresa May claimed that Islam is a
"religion of peace".
Pictured: Women
wearing Islamic niqab veils stand outside the French Embassy during a
demonstration on April 11, 2011 in London, England.
Although Europe is
not part of the Muslim world, many European authorities nevertheless seem to
feel obliged to submit to Islam in more or less subtle ways. This voluntary
submission appears to be unprecedented: Dhimmi, historically
speaking, is the Arabic term for the conquered non-Muslim, who agrees to live
as a second-rate, "tolerated" citizen, under Islamic rule, submitting
to a separate, demeaning set of laws and the demands of his Islamic masters.
by Burak Bekdil • February 22, 2018 at 4:00
am
§ Erdogan's ideological love affair with Hamas is
obligatory for all Islamists in this part of the world, and they do not tend to
forget it. In February, a deported Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) board
member, Sami al-Arian, denounced the United States as "our enemy."
§ For Turkey's Islamist leaders, Hamas is not a
tactical alliance or a geopolitical necessity for the country. It is an age-old
feature of political Islam capturing not just minds but hearts.
Pictured:
Palestinians, waving Hamas flags, hold a rally in support of Recep Tayyip
Erdogan (then Turkey's Prime Minister) on January 30, 2009, in Gaza City. (Photo
by Abid Katib/Getty Images)
Despite the nominal
'normalization' of diplomatic relations between Turkey and Israel, Ankara is
still fully supporting a terrorist organization -- one that Washington, among
others, lists as terrorist. The Shin Bet's report, the Istanbul conference and
its contents, the official Turkish support for that conference and Turkish
Foreign Ministry's explicit support of Hamas make new evidence that Turkey
insists on siding ideologically with a terrorist organization -- ironically at
a time when Erdogan claims Turkish troops are fighting terrorists in Syria.
In 2014, Turkey
hosted Salah al-Arouri, a Hamas commander whom the Palestinian Authority had
accused of planning multiple attacks against Israeli targets. At that time, the
newspaper Israel Hayom called Turkey's important guest
"an infamous arch-terrorist believed to be responsible for dozens of
attacks against Israelis".
Continue Reading Article
No comments:
Post a Comment